State v. Muldrow’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · City of Dayton v. Rogers · 57 Ohio App. 2d 229 - State v. Stephens · 55 Ohio App. 2d 46 - City of Columbus v. Michel · 5 Ohio Misc. 2d 20 - State v. Jelliffe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o person, without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized act within the public official's official capacity, shall do any act that hampers or impedes a public official in the performance of the public official's lawful duties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Florence · State v. Jones“act that hampers or impedes a public official.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Florence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.