Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 Ohio St. 2d 264

State v. Shepard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1967

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1967-06-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1981

1 state decisions

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · 10 Ohio St. 2d 183 - State v. Catlino

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-06-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1In the instant case, appellant, an indigent convicted defendant, was denied counsel on his appeal as of right.

¶2Under the doctrine enunciated in State v. Catlino, 10 Ohio St. 2d 183, and Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, a convicted indigent defendant has a constitutional right to court-appointed counsel at state expense on his appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals.

¶3The trial court, having determined that appellant was an indigent, erred in denying his request that it appoint counsel for him for his appeal as of right.

¶4The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the appointment of counsel for appellant’s appeal from the denial of his motion for a new trial.

¶5Judgment reversed,.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
/10/ohiost2d/264 · .json · Public domain