Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 OHIOST2D 43 - McDonald v. Haught

McDonald v. Haught’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1997

7 state decisions

401967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knisely v. Community Traction Co. · Larimore v. Wells · Edwin Putnam's Adm'r v. Heirs of Putnam · 126 Ohio St. 480 - DeWeese v. Security Savings Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * the cases awarding judgment to a defendant for the inadvertence of an attorney to file a reply are, generally, old precedents occurring at a time when a lawsuit ofttimes developed into a test of an attorney’s astuteness rather than a determination of the merit of a client’s contention. To decide a lawsuit on the failure of an attorney to file a reply rather than on the merits of a claim would seem an anachronism in our present-day system of jurisprudence. Further, the majority of the trial courts of this state avoid this pitfall entirely by either suggesting or perhaps, in some cases, ordering that a reply be filed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.