¶1 Opinion of the court by
¶2 Meyer Halff and Solomon Halff w'ere partners doing business under the firm name of M. Halff & Bro. This firm brought into the Osage Indian reservation during the months of March and April, 1898, 3,800 head of cattle and 16 horses for the purpose of grazing the same in transit for market. The officers of Pawnee county, (said reservation being attached to Pawnee county at that time for judicial and taxing purposes,) assessed these cattle and horses for that year.
¶3 The facts in this case are the same as the facts in the cases of Collins & Wallace v. Green, Treasurer, et al. and *339 Lasater & Noble v. Green, Treasurer, et al., decided at the present term of this court, and to which the parties to this action are referred for the reasons for the judgment in this case, except, in this case the plaintiff s admitted that a certain portion of the taxes claimed (which were the taxes levied on the horses) were just and legal and this sum, together with the costs on the tax-warrant, the plaintiff tendered to the county treasurer before bringing this suit; but they make no offer to pay such further taxes as the court may find to be just; and as they have not offered to do equity, the court will deny them any equitable relief. (Collins & Wallace v. Green, Treasurer, et al. supra; Lasater & Noble v. Green, Treasurer, et al. supra; State Railroad Tax cases, 92 U. S. 616; Kimball v. National Bank, 103 U. S. 733.)
¶4 The allegation in the petition that, “the cattle were brought into the reservation for the purpose of grazing the same in transit to market,” is not sufficient to take these cattle out of the general rule.
¶5 The judgment of the lower court is affirmed, and costs of this, as well as those of the lower court, are taxed to appellants.