Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 OR 129 - Rowland v. Warren

Rowland v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1882

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 1939
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1939

1 district · 6 state decisions

30188218901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It follows that Mary E. Hembree took either a fee simple or a fee simple conditional, defeasible on the contingency of her dying- without leaving children, with a limitation over by executory devise. As such contingency did not happen, she held the whole estate, and the sale of the estate, under the judgment against her, conveyed a good fee simple title to the purchaser.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““I further will and do give and bequeath to my youngest daughter Mary E. Hembree — (description of property) — to her and her body heirs forever.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.