Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 P.3d 560 - Capshaw v. State

Capshaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)

Relies on Holsey v. Director of Classification for Division of Corrections · Pataki v. Grumet · Kansas v. Nebraska · United States v. Singleton · United States v. Singleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We construe the statute as a whole, giving effect to every word, clause, and sentence, and we construe together all parts of the statute in pari materia so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.