Daniels v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2017
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View · California Department of Human Resources Development v. Java · Commonwealth v. Lentz · Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Any person who by reason of his fault has received any sum as compensation under [the UC] act to which he was not entitled, [sic] shall be hable to repay to the Unemployment Compensation Fund.. .a sum equal to the amount so received by him and interest.... (b)(1) Any person who other than by reason of his fault has received with respect to a benefit year any sum as compensation under this act to which he was not entitled shall not be hable to repay such sum but shah be hable to have such sum deducted from any future [UC] compensation payable to him with respect to such benefit year, or the three-year period immediately following such benefit year....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) Any person who by reason of his fault has received any sum as compensation under this act to which he was not entitled shall be liable to repay to the Unemployment Compensation Fund to the credit of the Compensation Account a sum equal to the amount so received by him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.