¶1I concur in the opinion of my brother Coloock. I found my opinion on the true intent and meaning of our own Act of Assembly, which admits of but one construction ; and that is, that the rights of a minor shall be protected during his disability. The commencement of the statute during the life of an ancestor, cannot alter the nature of a saving made in behalf *of helplessness and innocence. There is the same reason why the operation of the statute in such case should be suspended, as that it should not run where a minority exists at the time of the death of the ancestor, and before the cause of action has accrued.
10 S.C.L. 296
Faysoux v. Prather
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 15, 1818
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1818-11-15
This was an action of trespass, to try title. The jury found the following special verdict. “ We find that the land claimed by the plaintiffs, was granted to Peter Eaysoux, on the 15th October, 1784, and that Peter Faysoux, the grantee, died on the-day of February, 1795, leaving tbe plaintiffs, several of whom were •minors, and one of whom is now about twenty-four years of age, (and four other children,) two of whom, viz., Hester and Sarah, are still living, and Mary and…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1951
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1818-11-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →