¶1This cause was decided at the April, 1896, term of this court, and the opinion is reported in 8 S. D. 456, 6 N. W. 1088. On a petition for a rehearing, in view of the importance of the questions involved, this court granted a reargument, and the same was argued orally by counsel and on printed briefs at the *64October term, 1896, of this court. After a careful review of the authorities cited, we are of the opinion that, under the provisions of the constitution of this state, our former decision was correct, and should be adhered to. A further discussion of the questions does not seem to.be required, and we therefore, affirm our former decision and judgment, and they will stand as the decision and judgment of this court.
10 S.D. 63
Belatti v. Pierce
Decided June 16, 1897
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1897-06-16
On rehearing. Certiorari to review the proceedings by which plaintiff was convicted of violation of a city ordinance, and fined. Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the circuit court declaring the proceedings regular. In an opinion of this court reported in 8 S. D. at p. 456, the judgment was reversed.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1975
2 state decisions
Relies on Belatti v. Pierce
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
In this opinion upon the rehearing, the former decision… · Decided 1897-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →