10 So. 3d 660 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 846 So. 2d 472 - Logan v. State · 786 So. 2d 1173 - Carter v. State · 730 So. 2d 296 - Bain v. State · 743 So. 2d 70 - Padgett v. State · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Orders allowing withdrawal of counsel are conditional, and counsel shall remain of record for the limited purpose of representing the defendant in the lower tribunal regarding any sentencing error that the lower tribunal is authorized to address during the pendency of the direct appeal under rule 3.800(b)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Escobar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.