Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 So. 3d 693

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-05-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2012

1 state decisions

Relies on 693 So. 2d 1138 - Andrews v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-05-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Willie Lee Miller appeals the revocation of his probation arguing that the State produced only hearsay evidence to support the alleged violation of the conditions of probation. The State rightly concedes that revocation in this case was improper given reliance on hearsay exclusively. See Andrews v. State, 693 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

¶2 Accordingly, the order revoking probation is VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED for the reinstatement of probation with appropriate credit.

HAWKES, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
/10/so3d/693 · .json · Public domain