10 So. 3d 913 - Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 459 So. 2d 793 - Fairchild v. State · 478 So. 2d 1017 - Harper v. State · 921 So. 2d 292 - Spicer v. State · Lee v. State · 616 So. 2d 899 - Porter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court does not single out any instruction or take instructions out of context; rather, the instructions are to be read together as a whole. A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions given which present his theory of the case. This entitlement is limited, however, in that the court is allowed to refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.