Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 So. 3d 979 - McCraw v. Buchanan

10 So. 3d 979 - McCraw v. Buchanan’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 755 So. 2d 1077 - SNc v. JRD, JR. · Ethredge v. Yawn · 841 So. 2d 1119 - Robison v. Lanford · 859 So. 2d 1001 - In Re Custody of MAG · Mixon v. Sharp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If upon review this Court finds that 'the decree apportioning the costs [of the GAL] works a manifest injustice on any of the parties, the decree will be reversed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Our rules of procedure treat guardian ad litem fees as court costs to be awarded against the non-prevailing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.