Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 SW3D 411 - Oliver v. State

Oliver v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brown v. Illinois · Dowthitt v. State · Calloway v. State · Rhodes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accused retains the right to object at trial to evidence she alleges to have been unlawfully seized”). The vast majority of Mitchell’s testimony pertinent to this issue was given outside the jury’s presence. . After Mitchell concluded his testimony, the State called one additional witness before resting its case-in-chief. Laura called four witnesses before she took the stand herself. . Laura did testify that as her conversation with Mitchell and the others progressed, Mitchell raised his voice and ”[h]is face was turning red.” She continued,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen the State justifies an arrest on the basis of a warrant, it must produce the warrant and supporting affidavit to the trial court if the validity of the arrest is challenged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.