Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 SW3D 43 - Conrad v. State

Conrad v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 6th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Maryland v. Craig · King v. State · Johnson v. State · Etheridge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sec. 1. This article applies to a proceeding in the prosecution of a defendant for an offense under the following provisions of the Penal Code, if committed against a child under 17 years of age:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “court simply took the reasonable steps that were necessary to minimize the trauma facing [the complainant], which is allowed under Article 38.071 § 10.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re DTC

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.