State v. Dodd’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sutton v. United States · Lumpkin v. Lumpkin · First National Bank v. United States · Distajo v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. · Allustiarte v. Cooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an objection to proffered evidence is sustained, the party offering the evidence must make an offer of proof to preserve the matter for appellate review. The offer of proof must state facts that are specific and sufficiently detailed to establish the admissibility of the evidence sought to be introduced. Mere statements and conclusions of counsel are not sufficient. The preferred method of making an offer of proof is to question the witness on the stand out of the jury’s hearing. An offer of proof is required to allow the trial court to consider the testimony in context and to make an informed ruling as to its admissibility. State v. Dodd, 10 S.W.3d 546, 556 (Mo.App.1999) (citations omitted). The record reflects that after the trial court sustained the State’s objection, the appellant made no offer of proof. As such, we would have to speculate, which we cannot do, as to whether Harris, if allowed to testify, would have testified that his street name was “Killer K.” Without knowing what Harris’ testimony would have been, we logically cannot proceed to determine what effect, if any, the introduction of such evidence could have had on the jury’s verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dudley“The length of time a jury is allowed to deliberate and the decision whether to give the hammer instruction are within the discretion of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Friend“conceded in his motion that he had not been able to locate the [absent witnesses] for several months before his trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.