The Maryland Insurance Company v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis
10 U.S. 29 · 1810
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1986
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Auld v. Norwood · Schmidt v. United Insurance · First Municipality of New Orleans v. Commissioners of the General Sinking Fund · Griffin v. Cotten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not to consider blockades as existing, unless in respect to particular ports which may be actually invested, and then not to capture vessels bound to such ports, unless they shall have been previously warned not to enter them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Adula
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.