Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 U.S. 332 - Sere and Laralde v. Pitot

Sere and Laralde v. Pitot’s Empirical Analysis

10 U.S. 332 · 1810

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Downes v. Bidwell (1901), National Mut Ins Co of District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co Inc (1949)

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

1601810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chappedelaine v. Dechenaux · De Butts v. Bacon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nor shall any Circuit or District Court have cognizance of any suit * * * to recover the contents of any promissory note or oilier -chose in action in favor of any assignee * * * unless such suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover the said contents if no assignment or transfer had been made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we find Congress possessing and exercising the absolute and undisputed power of governing and legislating for the territor[ies].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory ... belonging to the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.