Young v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis
1894
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2012
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graffam v. Burgess · William Byers v. Francis Surget · Smith v. Huntoon · 4 Johns. Ch. 118 - Howell v. Baker · Morris v. Robey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All the cases unite in the doctrine that on gross inadequacy of price, coupled with irregularities attending the sale, especially where such irregularities are not merely formal and technical, but such as have a direct tendency to prevent the realizing of a fair price for the property sold, and are attributable to the purchaser at the sale, it is the duty of the courts to set the sale aside, unless the complaining party is estopped by his own laches.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A purchase by an attorney for his own benefit at a sale over which he has exercised any direction or control should always be closely scrutinized by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he plaintiff was assured by [the purchaser], before the period for redemption had expired, that the statutory period would not be insisted upon[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.