Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Utah 2d 169 - Hampton v. Rowley

10 Utah 2d 169 - Hampton v. Rowley’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1975
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 5 Utah 2d 116 - De Weese v. JC PENNY COMPANY · 3 Utah 2d 364 - Lindsay v. Eccles Hotel Company · 168 F. Supp. 195 - Lucas v. City of Juneau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is obvious, without laboring the point, that the principle set forth in the De Weese case: that the part of the permanent structure of the building was deemed to be known to the defendant, is not applicable here. In regard to a transitory condition of the character here involved, the instruction given is consistent with well established law that in order to find the defendants negligent it must be shown that they either knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known of any hazardous condition and had a reasonable opportunity to remedy the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.