Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Va. App. 169 - Wilmoth v. Commonwealth

10 Va. App. 169 - Wilmoth v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Marshall v. United States · Bottoson v. Florida · Stockton v. Commonwealth · Coppola v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The constitutional guarantee of an impartial jury does not contemplate excluding those who have read or heard news accounts concerning the case or even exclusion of those who have formed an opinion based on such accounts. . . . The test, instead, is whether a juror is capable of laying aside a preconceived opinion and rendering “a verdict solely on the evidence.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.