Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Va. App. 224 - Ford v. Commonwealth

10 Va. App. 224 - Ford v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2019

12 state decisions

80199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Va. App. 438 - Martin v. Commonwealth · Pedersen v. City of Richmond · 18 Md. App. 252 - Cherry v. State · Huffman v. Commonwealth · Wiseman v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`invit[ing] or solicit[ing] one to commit crime, where no attempt is actually made to commit it, . . . is indictable at common law as solicitation. Solicitation, or inciting to crime, does not proceed to the point of some overt act in the commission of crime.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny person who commands, entreats, or otherwise attempts to persuade another person to commit a murder is guilty of a felony punishable by confinement in a state correctional facility for a term not less than five years or more than forty years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]t is `immaterial whether the . . . crime solicited is in fact committed since the gist of this offense is incitement.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.