Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Va. App. 381 - Hope v. Commonwealth

10 Va. App. 381 - Hope v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2011

23 state decisions

150199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDougall v. North Carolina · Laverick v. United States · Lewis v. Commonwealth · Peterson v. Commonwealth · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the proper determination of a fact depends upon circumstantial evidence, the safe, practical rule to follow is that in no case is evidence to be excluded of facts or circumstances connected with the principal transaction, from which an inference can be reasonably drawn as to the truth of a disputed fact. The modern doctrine in this connection is extremely liberal in the admission of any circumstance which may throw light upon the matter being investigated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Boggs v. Commonwealth, 199 Va. 478, 486 , 100 S.E.2d 766, 772 (1957).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.