Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 Vet. App. 279

Black v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · decided 1997-06-04

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2016

10199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KRAMER and STEINBERG,

¶1Judges, dissenting:

¶2For the reasons set forth in Judge Kramer’s dissenting opinion to the panel opinion and because we believe that the panel opinion departs from the Court’s established precedent we voted for en banc review. See U.S. Vet.App. 35(c) (full Court review to “maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions”). We believe that the case should be remanded for adjudication of the appellant’s well-grounded claim.

/10/vetapp/279 · .json · Public domain