Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Wash. App. 754 - Schnitger v. Backus

10 Wash. App. 754 - Schnitger v. Backus’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2018

5 state decisions

3019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Old National Bank v. Gibson · Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co. · 110 Ga. App. 319 - Pazol v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK. · 89 N.J. Super. 43 - Citizens National Bank of Englewood v. Fort Lee Savings & Loan Association · 161 F. Supp. 790 - Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A bank has a security interest in an item and any accompanying documents or the proceeds of either (a) in case of an item deposited in an account to the extent to which credit given for the item has been withdrawn or applied; (b) in case of an item for which it has given credit available for withdrawal as of right, to the extent of the credit given whether or not the credit is drawn upon and whether or not there is a right of charge-back; or (c) if it makes an advance on or against the item.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Possession is a requisite to the status of 'holder in due course'; and therefore following the release of the check ..., the bank could not claim to be a 'holder in due course' as to another claimant who might come into possession of the reissued check.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Holder” means a person who is in possession of . . . an instrument . . . issued or indorsed to him or to his order or to bearer or in blank.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.