10 Wash. App. 827 - State v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1994
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Harris v. New York · 74 Wash. 2d 888 - State v. Lampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Joseph's trial counsel at no point requested such a hearing, but his failure to do so does not preclude appellate review because a denial of basic constitutional rights is raised in the asserted errors.... The record on appeal does not enable us to determine whether Joseph "knowingly and intentionally" waived a CrR 101.20W [now CrR 3.5] . .. Accordingly, we remand for the purpose of a CrR 101.20W hearing for a judicial determination of "voluntariness." ... If the trial judge determines that Joseph was not denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and that his statements to the detective were given voluntarily and without coercion, the verdict will stand. If not, Joseph will be granted a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[the] failure to do so does not preclude appellate review because a denial of basic constitutional rights is raised in the asserted errors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“waived a CrR 101.20W [now CrR 3.5] . .. Accordingly, we remand for the purpose of a CrR 101.20W hearing for a judicial determination of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.