Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Wash. App. 874 - State v. Terry

10 Wash. App. 874 - State v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2007

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

1201974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Harrington v. California · Beck v. Dye · 36 Wash. 2d 367 - State v. Goebel · 73 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the defendant asserts that a child has died as a result of an accident in the absence of any intent on his part to harm the child, evidence of prior and subsequent incidents involving the defendant’s treatment of children, including the deceased, may be relevant and necessary to prove an essential ingredient of the state’s case.[ 19 ]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not only fails to relate to the main event . . . but also relates merely to an event which is not established except by the hearsay testimony itself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[TJhere must be a logical relationship between the . . . misconduct and the question of defendant's guilt,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.