10 Wis. 2d 171 - Schultz v. Vick’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2020
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson · Donaldson v. Chase Securities Corp. · Troschansky v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. · Manas v. Hammond · Martin v. Lindner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The issue in this case is whether defendants had a vested constitutional right in the statutory notice requirement under the provisions of sec. 330.19(5), Stats. 1955, which provides: “ ‘ * * * No action to recover damages for an injury to the person shall be maintained unless, within 2 years after the happening of the event causing such damages, notice in writing, signed by the party damaged, * * * shall be served upon the person or corporation by whom it is claimed such damage was caused, * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The plaintiffs' cause of action arose when the collision[, the injury,] took place. The substantive rights of the parties came into being at that time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.