Gustavenson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Carfield v. State (1982), Crozier v. State (1986)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the well established rule of law that the testimony of a juror cannot be received to impeach the verdict in which he has concurred, and that, for stronger reasons, his unsworn statements repeated as hearsay in the affidavit of a third person must be rejected. (28 A. E. Ency. of Law, 273.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morris v. State“"* * * Where a crime rests in intention, the inebriated condition of the defendant at the time of committing the offense may be proven to the jury, as bearing upon the question of intention."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dodge v. State“insanity is an excuse for the commission of every crime, because the party has not the possession of that reason, which includes responsibility,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Poitra v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.