State v. Goodyear’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Arnett (1978), Commonwealth v. Vasquez (2010)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Massiah v. United States · Fahy v. Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is the duty of a trial court to hold a hearing as to voluntariness of a statement or confession, if a question as to its voluntariness is raised-either by the attorneys, or one is presented by the evidence”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““At the conclusion of the hearing on voluntariness, the judge . must make a definite determination whether the purported confession was voluntary or involuntary. Only if he makes a definite, determination it was voluntary may he admit it for consideration by the jury.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““At the conclusion of the hearing the court said 'The statements will be allowed in evidence,’ and the witness was thereafter permitted to testify thereto. It was evidently the intention of the court to find that the statements were voluntary. However, we have held since Jackson v. Denno, supra, [ 378 U.S. 368 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 ,] a definite determination as to voluntariness is necessary.” State v. Goodyear, 100 Ariz. 244, 249 , 413 P.2d 566, 568 (1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.