State v. Tannahill’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2011
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · State v. Owen · Andro v. Andro · State v. Costello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant testified that he talked with his attorney two or three times between the arrest and the morning of June 29th, when, at his request, he was taken to Detective John Rohr for a polygraph test.” State v. Tannahill, 100 Ariz. 59, 60 , 411 P.2d 166 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tannahill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.