Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 ARK 496 - Batesville v. Ball

Batesville v. Ball’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
3
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably State v. Kemp (1938), Johnson v. Johnson (1967)

51 state decisions

10019111920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vestal v. Little Rock · Board of Education of City of Atchison Kansas v. De Kay · Freeman v. Lazarus · Foreman v. Town of Marianna · Arkadelphia Lumber Co. v. Arkadelphia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a cause is appealed from the county court to the circuit court, the latter court obtains jurisdiction over the matter to the same extent as if it had been originally [^brought in that court, and it must proceed to fully try and determine the cause. It does not pass upon the question as to whether or not the county court has committed error in any of its rulings, either of law or of fact, but it must try the cause upon its merits, both of law and of fact, just as if it had been originally brought in the circuit court. It does not either affirm or reverse the findings or judgment of the county court, but tries the cause alone upon its merits, and determines the same by the exercise of its own discretion and judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When a lower court renders a final judgment upon which an execution may issue, or one dismissing the cause or the appeal, it thereby puts it out of the power of such court making the order after the expiration of the term to place the parties in their former condition, and thereby divests them of their rights, and such judgment or order is therefore final, and an appeal can be taken therefrom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.