Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 F.1d 268 - In re Conhaim

In re Conhaim’s Empirical Analysis

100 F. 268 · 1900

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 1933
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1933

1 federal appellate · 5 district ·

401900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Conhaim

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.