Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 F.2d 374 - In re Old Algiers, Inc.

In re Old Algiers, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

100 F.2d 374 · 1938

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 1986 · most notably In re Columbia Ribbon Co. (1941), Missouri v. Earhart (1940)

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

170193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royal Indemnity Co. v. Cooper · In re Carter · In re John G. Gasteiger & Co. · In re Inland Dredging Corp. · Sartorius v. Bardo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) If the petition in such proceedings was approved within three months prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act, the provisions of this chapter shall apply in their entirety to such proceedings; and “(2) If the petition in such proceedings was approved more than three months before the effective date of this amendatory Act, the provisions of this chapter shall apply to such proceedings to the extent that the judge shall deem their application practicable; * *”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The judge may allow reasonable compensation for services rendered * * * in connection with the administration of an estate in a proceeding under this chapter or in connection with a plan approved by the judge, whether or not accepted by creditors and stockholders or finally confirmed by the judge— “(1) by * * * committees or representatives of creditors or stockholders * * * and “(3) by the attorneys or agents for any of the foregoing * * ” Section 242, 11 U.S.C.A. § 642 . “Upon the dismissal of a proceeding under this chapter, or the entry of an order adjudging the debtor a bankrupt, the judge may allow reasonable compensation for services rendered and reimbursement for proper costs and expenses incurred in such proceeding prior to such dismissal or order of adjudication by any persons entitled thereto, as provided in this chapter, and shall make provision for the payment thereof, and for the payment of all proper costs and expenses incurred by officers in such proceedings.” Section 246, 11 U.S.C. A. § 646.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If, for example, administration had progressed so far that the assets of the estate had been distributed by way of dividends to creditors, it would be neither fair nor convenient to require creditors to return the dividends in order that fees might be paid pursuant to section 246; it would not be `practicable' to apply the new provision. But where, as in the present case, the trustee still has funds in hand and the time for proving claims of creditors has not expired, fees to which the appellants may be entitled can apparently be as conveniently and as justly paid out of the estate as if the proceeding had been begun after June 22, 1938. Under such circumstances, it would seem to be `practicable' to apply the amendatory provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.