Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 F.2d 395 - In re Muss

In re Muss’s Empirical Analysis

100 F.2d 395 · 1938

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
June 1983
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 1983 · most notably In re Sandow (1945), In the Matter of Robert A. Martin A/K/A R. Allan Martin A/K/A Robert Allan Martin, Bankrupt-Appellant (1977)

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

80193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Underhill · In re Lepine · Kay v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to keep or preserve books of account or records, from which his financial condition and business transactions might be ascertained”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In the Matter of Richard Knapp, Bankrupt-Appellant, Michael J. Daly, Iii, State Court Receiver of Tanglewood Incorporated, and J. E. Smith & Company, Incorporated, Objecting Creditors, and John F. Phelan, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Estate of Richard Knapp, Bankrupt · Knapp III

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.