Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

100 F.2d 405

Docket No. 122.

Baldwin v. Higgins

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 5, 1938.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1938-12-05

2 counsel of record

Relies on Arthur Harvey Co v. Malley · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Gray · Armstrong v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1938-12-05

¶1Richard Blaine Dawson, of New York City (Morris A. Schoenfeld, and Irvin T. Pollack, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶2Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Clarence W. Roberts, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

¶3Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This action seeks recovery of overpayment of income tax for the year 1932. By a compromise, a balance of tax díte was agreed upon and some payments made. A *406balance remaining unpaid, the taxpayer repudiated the agreement and sued to recover that which he had paid. The c'ase was tried without a jury. There are no findings of fact presented in this record. No rulings in the progress of the trial were excepted to at the time nor are they duly presented by the bill of exceptions. No substantial question on the pleadings is presented. The judgment will therefore be affirmed. Harvey Co. v. Malley, 288 U.S. 415, 53 S.Ct. 426, 77 L.Ed. 866; Eastman Kodak Co. v. Gray, 292 U.S. 332, 54 S.Ct. 722, 78 L.Ed. 1291; Armstrong v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 85 F.2d 185.

¶6Judgment affirmed.

/100/f2d/405 · .json · Public domain