United States v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
100 F.3d 1300 · 1996
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2018
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · United States v. DiFrancesco · United States v. Scott · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Brady [does not] require[ ] the Government to carry the burden of transcribing [65 hours of intercepted conversations]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“information the defendants seek is available to them through the exercise of reasonable diligence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“had been given the same opportunity as the government to discover the identified documents”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.