Chamblee v. Espy’s Empirical Analysis
100 F.3d 15 · 1996
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2018
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franklin v. Massachusetts · First National Bank of Chicago v. Comptroller of the Currency of the United States · Kershaw v. Resolution Trust Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. ; see Kershaw v. Resolution Tr. Corp. , 987 F.2d 1206 , 1208 (5th Cir. 1993) (”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the agency has completed its decision-making process, and whether the result of that process is one that will directly affect the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“amounts to final agency action [that is] subject to judicial review according to the APA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.