Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 F.3d 532 - McCormack v. Citibank, N.A.

McCormack v. Citibank, N.A.’s Empirical Analysis

100 F.3d 532 · 1996

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Temporomandibular Joint Implants Products Liability Litigation Temporomandibular Joint Implant Recipients v. The Dow Chemical Company, Nebraska Public Power District v. MidAmerican Energy Co. (2000)

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Kashif v. United States · Reichelt v. Gates · Tennessee v. Middlebrooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a question of law appropriate for summary judgment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.