Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 F.3d 7 - United States v. Peterson

United States v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

100 F.3d 7 · 1996

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
4
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Yousef (2003), United States v. Miller (1997)

47 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

4801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Ashe v. Swenson · United States v. Sokolow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] declarant is not unavailable as a witness if exemption, refusal, claim of lack of memory, inability, or absence is due to the procurement or wrongdoing of the proponent of a statement for the purpose of preventing the witness from attending or testifying.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we review de novo the legal issues presented [and] we accept the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous, ... view[ing] those facts in the light most favorable to the government.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he sponsor of a declarant's former testimony may not create the condition of unavailability and then benefit therefrom.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.