Wilkinson v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] hostile environment claim involves one unlawful employment practice that can be comprised of a series of separate incidents. As long as one component incident occurred within the applicable limitations period, every component incident of the hostile environment may be considered for purposes of liability regardless of when those events occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must comply with the same administrative procedures that govern federal employee Title VII claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stewart v. Iancu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.