Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

100 F. App'x 964

McQueen v. USA

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 10, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-06-10

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Alvy McQueen asserts a statutory action against the United States and a Bivens action against various government employees. The district court entered summary judgment for defendants, and McQueen appeals.

¶2 We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. In summary, the statutory action is barred by limitations, and the district court committed no reversible error in finding immunity on the Bivens actions.

¶3*965 The district court properly denied McQueen a waiver of fees regarding his FOIA request. If, however, McQueen is willing to pay the fees, he is not barred from pursuing a FOIA request.

¶4 It is time for this aged litigation to be put to bed. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

¶5 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set fort in 5th Cir. •R. 47.5.4.

/100/fappx/964 · .json · Public domain