¶1 concurring specially: I do not think a judgment non obstante was proper in this case, first, because I think at least one of the pleas was good, and, second, the judgment shows it was based upon the evidence as well as the pleadings. See special concurring opinion by the writer in Pillet v. Ershick, 126 So. R. 784, 788. I therefore doubt the necessity for a repleader, but concur in the judgment of reversal.
100 Fla. 393
129 So 765
Johnston v. Campbell
Decided July 30, 1930
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1930-07-30
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1937
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1930-07-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →