Rader v. Prather’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Dooley v. Weil (1982), Gilman v. Butzloff (1945)
8 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sheets v. Selden · Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. Knight · Louis Kann v. Caroline King Henry Randall Webb · Baker v. Clifford-Mathew Investment Co. · Gordon v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The fact that the forfeiture has been enforced by proceedings at law for the recovery of possession is not itself ground for denying relief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[F]orfeiture clauses are not favored in either law or equity[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.