Rios v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation (1996), In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation (2002)
5 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 49 (Wagner-Peyser Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“class definition ... should be limited to those individuals who were adversely affected by the practices of which the named plaintiffs complain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.