Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 FRD 705 - Coleman v. Block

Coleman v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
February 1993
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1981A

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Califano v. Yamasaki · Coleman v. Block

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. defendants shall give any plaintiffs against whom the defendants propose to proceed at least 30 days notice: a. That informs the borrower of his right to a hearing to contest the proposed action and to establish eligibility for loan deferral pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 1981a'; b. That provides the borrower with a statement that gives the reasons for the proposed action; c. That informs the borrower of the factors that determine eligibility for loan deferrals; d. That informs the borrower of the official who would preside at the hearing. The official designated shall not have been actively involved in the initial decision to take the proposed action. 2. The official presiding at any such hearing shall present his decision in writing, giving his reasons therefore [sic], which decision shall be furnished to the borrower.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that Plaintiffs are required to move by November 7, 1983 for the inclusion of such additional defendants deemed necessary given the expanded nature of this suit; Plaintiffs shall attach to this motion a proposed method of serving these additional defendants the pleadings and order of temporary injunction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no graduation requirement for guaranteed loans”), § 1980.290 (subpart C, “no ‘graduation’ requirement for [emergency livestock] loans”), and § 1980.589 (subpart F, economic emergency loans, “no ‘graduation’ requirement for guaranteed loans”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.