Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 FSUPP 361 - Blau v. Hodgkinson

Blau v. Hodgkinson’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2005
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2005 · most notably Kern County Land Company v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation (1973), Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co. (1967)

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

150195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc. · Smolowe v. Delendo Corp. · Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Humboldt Steamship Co. · United States ex rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Gratz v. Claughton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““where the settlement is made with the corporation direct, * * * the settlor must run the risk of any very detrimental ‘mistakes’ made in determining the amount of his liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.