100 F. Supp. 2d 1233 - Bingham v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. · Bates v. State Bar of Arizona · New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To the extent that potentially misleading statements of private certification or specialization could confuse consumers, a State might consider screening certifying organizations or requiring a disclaimer about the certifying organization or the standards of a specialty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Borgner v. Brooks“could be addressed by requiring disclosure in the advertisement that the AAID is not recognized by the Dental Board or the ADA”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Borgner v. Brooks“the placing of devices for attaching artificial replacement teeth to the same bones to which natural teeth are anchored.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Borgner v. Brooks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.