Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 Idaho 614 - State v. Powers

State v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · Rabinovitch v. Nyquist · State v. Cotton · State v. Seifart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant next claims that the magistrate erred in allowing the undercover narcotics agent Rohrbach to refresh his memory from a copy of a report dictated by him, to which certain material had been added. We see no clear showing of an abuse of discretion in such a procedure, and therefore do not disturb the magistrate's probable cause conclusion. [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Absent a showing of some material change in defendant's circumstances in the nine day interim it was not error to reuse the same report.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.