Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 Kan. 102 - Wideman v. Faivre

Wideman v. Faivre’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
5
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Bruington v. Wagoner (1917), Hoff v. Hoff (1920)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

9019171920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hess v. Conway · Pittman & Harrison Co. v. Hayes · Dubois v. . Beaver · Underwood v. Fosha · Tarpenning v. Cannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The supreme court’s jurisdiction is invariably and exclusively original or appellate. There is never a confusion or blending of both.” (Citing Hess v. Conway, supra, and other decisions.) (p. 108.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.